[ intimologies ] [ gnusystems ] [ SourceNet ] [ Turning Words ] [ Reference list ]
This is the GNOXIC nexus
where gnosis crosses with the stream of semiosis.
This inquiry into the nature of meaning emanates from the backwoods of Manitoulin Island, Canada.
Mail: gnox -at- xplornet (dot) com.
Most recently updated
as of 3 February 2010:
Turning Words, currently under revision, is a book about reading, especially what i call whole-body reading. When your whole bodymind is engaged with a text or sign (in any medium), and your life transformed by that engagement, i call that sign/text a ‘scripture.’ But that kind of deep reading is involved with ordinary communication and language (which we often take for granted), grounded in the everyday reading of the world that we call perception, and even more deeply grounded in life itself. Turning Words explores that grounding in common experience, drawing upon the conceptual resources of Peircean semiotics, philosophy, biology, psychology and so on. It also incorporates ancient scriptures, such as the sayings of Heraclitus and of Jesus (especially as given in the Gospel of Thomas). Throughout this inquiry, the central question is: How do you mean? Some chapters (and a list of the others) are now online here. Sources are cited parenthetically in the standard way, with some abbreviations – a key to these is given in the reference list.
For a list of the major authors with whom i have crossed paths in this inquiry, see the SourceNet page, which is organized and indexed by topic, but indexed by author as well. Since i've drawn ideas and quotations from many sources in SeedNet and my book (Turning Words), i wanted to make it possible for readers to get more information about those sources, but without inserting footnotes that would be distracting. My solution is to insert links to this page instead of footnotes or other paraphernalia, so the reader is free to either follow the links or ignore them. Some entries include passages quoted from that source.
Gary Fuhrman has been using the handle gnox on the Net since the late 1980s. The name refers in part to gnosis (Greek γνωσις), which originally meant inquiry, knowledge, recognition or acquaintance, but in more recent usage represents the intuitive, mystical, private or esoteric side of ‘knowing’ in contrast to the more public and scientific side. Gnoxic studies aim in part to show that ‘gnosis’ and science are in fact two sides of the same coign, so to speak. The x is crucial, if you'll pardon the pun: it symbolizes the crossing of paths at the heart of genuine dialogue. It's also a reminder that inquiry, or dialog (see Chapter 2 of Turning Words) is always exploratory. (Thus it was fitting indeed that the gnoxic site moved to Xplornet in the spring of 2007.)
Since 2000, Gary has also been half of a partnership with Pam Jackson called gnusystems. ‘Gary Gnu’ was a character in an old TV show for kids, and gnu became a family nickname for the domestic side of gnox—which is a reversal of sorts, since the gnu (also called wildebeest) is a kind of wild ox.
This ox also appears in Buddhist scripture, for instance in the third chapter of the Lotus Sutra and the famous series of ‘oxherding pictures’ published in several popular anthologies of Zen literature. Gnoxic studies entail finding and taming such an ox, but also releasing the wild truth dwelling within the domestic realm of words and other symbols. The instructions given by Dogen to a couple of newly appointed officials at his monastery are appropriate here:
Becoming oxen you need to pull the plow and the till; becoming horses you need to bite the reins and wear a saddle. Putting on fur, crowned with horns, swinging the tail, and shaking the head, kick over the barrier and enter straight through the dragon gate. Without seeking to become sages, be people who are capable of your duties. Without valuing personal spiritual development, be the host within the guest.Ox is also the meaning of aleph, the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet. And since it is silent (like the first letter of gnox), i will refrain from mentioning the Kabbalistic significance of this fact.— Dogen, Eihei Koroku 2.139 (Leighton and Okumura 2004, 168)
[ intimologies (gnoxic weblog) ] [ gnusystems home page ]