Managing Ontario’s Aggregate Resources

 

Melancthon Mega Quarry

Proposed by The Highland Companies

 

 

Today’s aggregate resource management policies evolved from the following legislation:

 

1971 - Pits and Quarries Control Act

 

1982 - Aggregate Resources Planning Policy

 

1986 - Mineral Aggregate Resources Policy Statement

 

1990 - Aggregate Resources Act

 

HISTORY

 

Aggregates policy in Ontario has evolved over time from a system in which municipalities had a substantial amount of control over the siting and regulation of aggregate extraction, to a primarily province-led system.

 

Ontario’s aggregate industry first came under significant regulation during the 1950s. Growth in economic activity and the resulting demand for aggregates, combined with the movement of populations into the urban fringe, led to increased impacts on local communities. By the late 1960s, there was increasing conflict between the aggregate industry and municipalities and substantial levels of aggregate production taking place.

 

Until the 1970s, the Planning Act enabled municipalities to establish by-laws to prevent the opening of new pits and quarries. This changed in 1971 with the introduction of the Pits and Quarries Control Act, which came about in response to a request by the aggregate industry that Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) review aggregates issues in the province.

 

The Pits and Quarries Control Act established a licensing system for aggregate extraction operations, to be administered by MNR, which applied to important production areas in Southern Ontario, Sault St. Marie and Sudbury.  However, this Act was viewed as insufficient to address the problems associated with the aggregates industry, and concerns were raised about the lack of strong regulations or site plan requirements, and inconsistent enforcement.

 

Provincial planning for aggregates became increasingly formal in the early 1980s with the cabinet approval of the Aggregate Resources Planning Policy in 1982.

 

In 1986 the provincial government introduced the Mineral Aggregate Resources Policy Statement (MARPS). This policy statement was made under Ontario’s Planning Act, and was a precursor to the Provincial Policy Statement. The MARPS was a key development in the movement towards an explicit close-to-market management strategy for aggregate resources in the province.

 

The MARPS declared aggregate resources to be a matter of provincial interest and included the provision to preserve as much of the aggregate resource occurring in the municipality as is realistically possible. The Commission on Planning Development and Reform, established in the early 1990s, recommended in its final report, New Planning for Ontario, that this provision of the MARPS be maintained in future incarnations of provincial planning policy.

 

The recommendations of the Commission on Planning Development and Reform were implemented as the Comprehensive Set of Policy Statements, which formed the basis of the current Provincial Policy Statement. The general planning principles for aggregates first established in MARPS have continued through to the most recent edition of Ontario’s Provincial Policy Statement.

 

 

Aggregate Resources Act

 

The Aggregate Resources Act (ARA) replaced the Pits and Quarries Control Act in 1990 and added more stringent requirements for aggregate licences including more detailed requirements for site planning, as well as broader geographic coverage that was not previously a part of the Pits and Quarries Control Act.

 

The ARA governs the management of the aggregate resources of Ontario. The Act controls and regulates aggregate operations located on Crown and private lands through a system of licences and permits. Pits and quarries located on private lands are regulated through the issuance of licences. Pits and quarries located on crown lands are regulated through the issuance of permits.  Temporary “wayside” permits may also be issued to provide aggregates for specific development projects. The ARA also includes requirements for the rehabilitation of land from which aggregate has been excavated. One of the purposes of the ARA is to minimize adverse impact of aggregate operations on the environment.

 

In 1997, standard criteria were introduced for licence, aggregate permit and wayside permit applications. The Aggregate Resources of Ontario Provincial Standards (AROPS) establish the specific conditions and operational standards that an aggregate extraction operation must follow. However, the standards have been criticized for not establishing tests that producers must meet prior to the approval of a new operation or the expansion of an existing operation.

 

In addition to the provincial standards, MNR has developed the Aggregate Resources Program Policies and Internal Procedures Manual to guide implementation of the ARA. The manual predates the Provincial Standards but was updated in 2006 to reflect the AROPS, provide additional details on how to interpret the standards in practice and reflect MNR experience with the standards since 1997.

 

The purposes of the Aggregate Resources Act are to provide guidelines for the management of aggregate resources in Ontario, to regulate aggregate operations on Crown and private lands, to require rehabilitation of land from which aggregate has been excavated and to minimize the adverse environmental impact of aggregate operations.

 

The Minister of Natural Resources is responsible for the administration of this Act and in doing so, the Minister may initiate studies and research related to the aggregate industry including environmental and social matters.

 

For an overview of the application process click here.

 

Licences

 

Any person may apply to the Minister for a licence to remove aggregate from privately owned land that is zoned to allow for aggregate extraction.

o       Class ‘A’ licence allows for removal of more than 20,000 tonnes of aggregate annually from a pit or quarry

o       Class ‘B’ licence allows for the removal of 20,000 tonnes or less

 

A licence applicant may be required to furnish additional information in such form and manner as is considered necessary by the Minister, and until the information is furnished, further consideration of the application may be refused.

 

Every application for a licence shall include a site plan and reports in accordance with the Regulations.  These may include reports on planning and land use considerations, quality and quantity of aggregate on site, haulage routes and truck traffic.  An applicant must also furnish information satisfactory to the Minister describing the zoning by-laws applicable to the site and adjacent lands.

 

Once the application is submitted, the applicant must abide by the prescribed notification and consultation process which, amongst other things, requires that they hold an information session for the public, provide written notice of the application to adjacent landowners, advertise the application in the local newspaper and post a sign on the property indicating that a licence application has been submitted for the site. 

During this 45 day notification period, any member of the public may object or comment on the application, and if they file a written objection with the applicant and the Ministry of Natural Resources within this time, the applicant must attempt to resolve the objections.

Under the Environmental Bill of Rights, the MNR is required to publish new licence applications on the environmental registry for a minimum of 30 days which provides an alternate forum for public or municipal comment or objection.

At the completion of the notification and consultation period, the applicant is required to  submit to the Ministry a summary of all of the objections, how the applicant attempted to resolve the objections, and whether there are any objections that they were not able to resolve.

 

If there are unresolved objections, the Minister may refer the application to the Ontario Municipal Board for a hearing.  Objectors have an opportunity to attend the hearing and raise their concerns before the Board.

The OMB may then direct the Minister to issue or refuse the licence.  If no hearing is required, the Minister will determine whether or not to issue or refuse the licence.

 

In both cases, consideration for issuance or refusal shall have regard to:

 

a) the effect of the operation of the pit or quarry on the environment

b) the effect of the operation of the pit or quarry on nearby communities

c) any comments provided by a municipality in which the site is located

d) the suitability of the progressive rehabilitation and final rehabilitation plans for the site

e) any possible effects on ground and surface water resources

f) any possible effects of the operation of the pit or quarry on agricultural resources

g) any planning and land use considerations

h) the main haulage routes and proposed truck traffic to and from the site

i) the quality and quantity of the aggregate on the site

j) the applicant’s history of compliance with the Act and the regulations, if a licence or permit has previously been issued to the applicant

k) such other matters as are considered appropriate

 

If the Minister refuses to issue the licence, the applicants may appeal to the OMB.

 

Tariff

 

Under the ARA, the owner of a Class ‘A’ licence is required to pay an annual fee of 11.5 cents per tonne of extracted aggregate.  (According to In the Hills Magazine the UK charges $3.22 per tonne.)

 

In the case of the proposed Mega Quarry, the fee breakdown would be as follows:

 

12/23 goes to Melancthon

 

3/23 goes to Dufferin County

 

1/23 goes to the Aggregate Resources Trust (this money is used to rehabilitate abandoned quarries and is also used for research)

 

7/23 goes to the Crown

 

 

Other Provincial & Federal Legislation Affecting Aggregate Extraction

 

Even when all requirements are met under the Aggregate Resources Act, the licence applicant may still be required to obtain approvals under other legislation, both Provincial and Federal.  This holds true throughout the application process as well as throughout the duration of the quarry or pit operation.

 

Provincial legislation includes Conservation Authorities Act, Endangered Species Act, Environmental Assessment Act, Environmental Bill of Rights, Environmental Protection Act, Ontario Water Resources Act, Occupational Health & Safety Act, Public Transportation and Highway Improvement Act and the Planning Act.

 

Federal legislation includes the Fisheries Act, Migratory Birds Convention Act and Species at Risk Act.

 

UPDATE

 

On March 22, 2012 the provincial government announced that it would be undertaking a review of the ARA in accord with their election promise.  Michael Gravelle (Minister of Natural Resources) announced that “the Standing Committee on General Government review the Aggregate Resources Act and report to the House its observations and recommendations with respect to strengthening the Act. In developing such recommendations, the Committee's focus shall include, but not be limited to, the following areas: The Act's consultation process; How siting, operations, and rehabilitation are addressed in the Act; Best practices and new developments in the industry; Fees / Royalties; and, Aggregate resource development and protection, including conservation / recycling.”

 

Baylis presentation to Committee (Orangeville 27-Jun-2012)

NDACT/Cosack presentation to Committee (Orangeville 27-Jun-2012)

Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) presentation to Committee (Toronto 9-May-2012?)

Cement Association of Canada presentation (Toronto 9-May-2012?)

Niagara Escarpment Commission letter (17-Jul-2012)

 

Standing Committee on General Government Link – watch this site for the upcoming agenda and referrals for the ARA

 

Transcripts:

 

1.  Toronto (7-May-2012) - first hearing with presentations from Gordon Miller, ECO and MNR.  Link: http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details.do;jsessionid=c72d607830d6f56a4d537bb746398f239c67ed035e06.e3eQbNaNa3eRe38Tbx8MaN8Pe6fznA5Pp7ftolbGmkTy?locale=en&Date=2012-05-07&ParlCommID=8958&BillID=&Business=Aggregate+Resources+Act+review&DocumentID=26292

 

2.  Toronto (9-May-2012) - second hearing with presentations from aggregate industry representatives including OSSGA, St. Mary's and Holcim.  Link:    

http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details.do?locale=en&Date=2012-05-09&ParlCommID=8958&BillID=&Business=Aggregate+Resources+Act+review&DocumentID=26320

 

3.  Toronto (14-May-2012) - third hearing with presentations from various groups including Gravel Watch, C Wigle, Townships, etc. for a total of 16 presentations over 4 hours.  Link:

http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details.do?locale=en&Date=2012-05-14&ParlCommID=8958&BillID=&Business=Aggregate+Resources+Act+review&DocumentID=26338

 

4.  Toronto (16-May-2012) - fourth hearing with 8 presentations including Lafarge, SERA, OFA, and ending with Carl Cosack of NDACT.  Link:

http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details.do?locale=en&Date=2012-05-16&ParlCommID=8958&BillID=&Business=Aggregate+Resources+Act+review&DocumentID=26346

 

5.  Orangeville (27-Jun-2012) – 18 presentations with one aggregate representative:

 

http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details.do?Date=2012-06-27&ParlCommID=8958&BillID=&Business=Aggregate+Resources+Act+review&locale=en&DocumentID=26476

 

6.  Kitchener-Waterloo (9-Jul-2012) – 18 mixed presentations:

 

http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details.do?Date=2012-07-09&ParlCommID=8958&BillID=&Business=Aggregate+Resources+Act+review&locale=en&DocumentID=26492

 

7.  Ottawa (16-Jul-2012) - 5 presentations with all aggregate representatives and the local Federation of Agriculture:

 

http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details.do?Date=2012-07-16&ParlCommID=8958&BillID=&Business=Aggregate+Resources+Act+review&locale=en&DocumentID=26499

 

8.  Sudbury (18-Jul-2012) – 6 presentations with all aggregate representatives:

 

http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details.do?Date=2012-07-17&ParlCommID=8958&BillID=&Business=Aggregate+Resources+Act+review&locale=en&DocumentID=26506

 

 

Committee Members Link

 

Get Status/Participate in the Committee Link

 

 

The time has come to stop developing aggregate resources at the expense of all else.

 

Ontario's Aggregate Resources Act (ARA) is based on 40-year old values.  The ARA allows pits/quarries to be dug anywhere including environmentally protected land; it bypasses the environmental assessment process; it does not require that proof of need of the aggregate be established; it requires that pits/quarries be dug "close to market" which undermines recycling efforts; it does not take farmland, source water or people's health protection into account.   The ARA and its underlying policies must be updated.  What worked in the 1970s does not necessarily work today.  We need to be diligent and make sure that the ARA review takes today’s values and environmental standards into account.  We need to recycle and preserve this finite product.  We need to protect our prime farmland, food security, water resources and at-risk species.  We may have to pay more money for aggregate but we will have to pay either way.  The decisions we make today will have a tremendous impact on the lifestyles of future generations.  Stay in touch with your MPP.  Keep sending those cards and letters to the provincial Minister of Natural Resources and the Minister of the Environment as well as the Premier.  Stay informed.  Don’t let others make these very crucial decisions for your children.

 

Recommendation for Changes to ARA as compiled by D. Baylis

 

Contact your local Ministers

 

 

 

 

Overview - proposed mega-quarry

 

Return to www.facebook.com/friends.of.ndact

 

 

 

 

Date

Source

Title

Comment

2013-05-13

Orangeville Banner

Food and Water First back from the brink

Chris Halliday

2013-04-30

Alliston Herald

Group working to change aggregate act

Maija Hoggett

2013-04-18

Orangeville Banner

Editorial:  Take action to protect farmland

 

2013-04-17

Green Party of Ontario

Open Letter:  Time to complete review of  Aggregate Resources Act

Mike Schreiner, Leader

2013-04-17

Orangeville Banner

Food and water last?

Bill Tremblay

2013-04-11

Comment

The review was effectively cancelled once government was prorogued.  Now that Kathleen Wynne has been named Premier, cabinet has been shuffled and it is business as usual at Queen’s Park, it is time to demand that the ARA Review be finished.

Baylis’ open letter

2012-08-17

Comment

The public aspects of the ARA Review hearing are complete.  Now we wait for the Standing Committee on General Government’s report.  It doesn’t hurt however to continue to send your comments to your MPP and the Premier and let them know how fresh food and clean water must be prioritized ahead of aggregate.  We need aggregate, but we need food and water first.

 

Have a Voice!  Don’t let anyone else make decisions for You and Your Kids.